Description
**This course will NOT provide the participant with BACB CEUs**
Not looking for CEUs, but want to join in the research fun?!
Join us for our monthly Research Review Club on 9/10/23 where we will be covering: “Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Children with Intellectual Disabilities” 1 General CEU will be provided for participating in an online discussion and completing a final quiz based on the live discussion. It is strongly recommended that you read the article prior to the live event to get the most out of the course.
Research Abstract: The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a sexual abuse prevention program for children with intellectual disabilities. Three children with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities participated in the study. They were taught skills relative to identifying body parts and discrimination between appropriate and inappropriate situations, refusal skills (verbal refusing and leaving situations), and reporting skills through this program. A multiple probe across participants design was used to determine the effects of the program. Results demonstrated that the program was effective for teaching the skills to all three children with intellectual disabilities. In addition, these skills generalized in probes conducted in real-life settings and maintained at 10-week follow-up probes.
Keywords: N/A
Article Citation: 2016) Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Children with Intellectual Disabilities. Behav. Intervent., 31: 195– 209. doi: 10.1002/bin.1439.
(Target Audience: Board Certified Behavior Analysts, Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analysts or anyone interested in Behavior Analytic Research!
Learning Objectives: As a result of this course, participants will be able to …
- Summarize the information from 2016) (
- Identify common themes throughout the research by 2016) (
- Discuss specific ideas from the research by 2016), with other participants. (
- Identify how the research by 2016), can be generalized to their practice. (
- Identify how the research by 2016), could not be generalized to their practice and/or what modifications would be needed to do so. (